A desirable element of cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) modeling is a syst
ematic way to relate uncertainty about input parameters to uncertainty in t
he computational results of the CEA model. Use of Bayesian statistical esti
mation and Monte Carlo simulation provides a natural way to compute a poste
rior probability distribution for each CEA result. We demonstrate this appr
oach by reanalyzing a previously published CEA evaluating the incremental c
ost-effectiveness of tissue plasminogen activator compared to streptokinase
for thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction patients using data from t
he GUSTO trial and other auxiliary data sources. We illustrate Bayesian est
imation for proportions, mean costs, and mean quality-oi-life weights. The
computations are performed using the Bayesian analysis software WinBUGS, di
stributed by the MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge, England.