Purpose: During assisted conception treatment the male partner is under str
ess and consequently can fail to produce semen sample prior to egg collecti
on. Failure to produce spermatozoa at a given time could lend to cancellati
on of the procedure.
Methods: We report the use of emergency percutaneous epididymal sperm aspir
ation (PESA) for temporary erectile dysfunction in a couple undergoing in v
itro fertilization treatment. In the last 2 years, we saw three men who Sai
led to produce a semen sample on the day of their partners' egg collection
procedure.
Results: In the first case the male partner failed to produce semen after e
gg collection and the cycle was canceled. This clinical scenario was likely
to recur and one of the options was to consider PESA. In the second case t
he male partner was counseled about the availability of PESA but he managed
to produce spermatozoa at home. The third patient was unable to produce a
semen sample despite being provided audiovisual support and being allowed t
o go home. Five hours after the egg collection, emergency PESA was performe
d after appropriate counseling. The procedure yielded motile spermatozoa wh
ich were used for intracytoplasmic sperm injection which resulted in succes
sful fertilization, embryo transfer and pregnancy.
Conclusions: This case emphasizes that surgical procedures, such as PESA, T
ESA, and TESE, are useful alternatives but should be the last option to obt
ain sperm for ART. Other nonsurgical procedures, such as audiovisual aids,
producing sperm at home, and the use of sildenafil citrate (Viagra) must be
offered first to men with temporary erectile dysfunction during ART treatm
ent.