Equivalence of three or four cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatinchemotherapy and of a 3- or 5-day schedule in good-prognosis germ cell cancer: A randomized study of the European organization for research and treatment of cancer genitourinary tract cancer cooperative group and the medicalresearch council
R. De Wit et al., Equivalence of three or four cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatinchemotherapy and of a 3- or 5-day schedule in good-prognosis germ cell cancer: A randomized study of the European organization for research and treatment of cancer genitourinary tract cancer cooperative group and the medicalresearch council, J CL ONCOL, 19(6), 2001, pp. 1629-1640
Purpose: to test the equivalence of three versus four cycles of bleomycin,
etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) and of the 5-day schedule versus 3 days per
cycle in good-prognosis germ cell cancer.
Patients and Methods: The study was designed as a 2 x 2 factorial trial. Th
e aim was to rule out a 5% decrease in the 2-year progression-free survival
(PFS) rate. The study included the assessment of patient quality of life.
A cycle of BEP consisted of etoposide 500 mg/m(2), administered at either 1
00 mg/m(2) days 1 through 5 or 165 mg/m2 days 1 through 3, cisplatin 100 mg
/m2, administered at either 20 mg/m(2) days 1 through 5 or 50 mg/m(2) days
1 and 2. Bleomycin 30 mg was administered on days 1, 8, and 15 during cycle
s 1 through 3. The randomization procedure allowed some investigators to pa
rticipate only in the comparison of three versus four cycles.
Results: From March 1995 until April 1998, 812 patients were randomly assig
ned to receive three or four cycles: of these, 681 were also randomly assig
ned to the 5-day or the 3-day schedule. Histology, marker values, and disea
se extent are well balanced in the treatment arms of the two comparisons. T
he projected 2-year PFS is 90.4% on three cycles and 89.4% on four cycles.
The difference in PFS between three and four cycles is -1.0% (80% confidenc
e limit [CL], -3.8%, +1.8%). Equivalence for three versus four cycles is ch
imed because both the upper and lower bounds of the 80% CL are less than 5%
. In the 5- versus 3-day comparison, the projected 2-year PFS is 88.8% and
89.7%, respectively difference, -0.9%, (80% CL, -4.1%, +2.2%). Hence, equiv
alence is claimed in this comparison also. Frequencies of hematologic and n
onhematologic toxicities were essentially similar. Quality of life was main
tained better in patients receiving three cycles; no differences were defec
ted between 3 and 5 days of treatment.
Conclusion: We conclude that three cycles of BEP, with etoposide at 500 mg/
m2, is sufficient therapy in good-prognosis germ cell cancer and that the a
dministration of the chemotherapy in 3 days has no detrimental effect on th
e effectiveness of the BEP regimen. (C) 2001 by American Society of Clinica
l Oncology.