Sj. Thompson et al., Immediate neurocognitive effects of methylphenidate on learning-impaired survivors of childhood cancer, J CL ONCOL, 19(6), 2001, pp. 1802-1808
Purpose: To test if methylphenidate (MPH) has an objective beneficial effec
t on immediate performance on tests of neurocognitive functions among learn
ing-impaired survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and
malignant brain tumors (BT).
Patients and Methods: From July 1, 1997 through December 31, 1998, 104 long
-term survivors of childhood ALL or a malignant BT completed neurocognitive
screening for learning impairments and concurrent problems with sustained
attention. Eligibility criteria for the MPH trial included an estimated int
elligence quotient greater than 50, academic achievement in the 16(th) perc
entile or lower for age in reading, math, or spelling, and an ability to su
stain attention on a computerized version of the Conners' Continuous Perfor
mance Test (CPT) in the 16(th) percentile or lower for age and sex. Of the
104, 32 (BT, n = 25; ALL, n = 7) were eligible on the basis of these a prio
ri criteria for a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of M
PH. The patients ingested a placebo (lactase) or MPH (0.6 mg/ kg; 20 mg max
imum) and repeated selected portions of the screening battery 90 minutes la
ter.
Results: Compared to the 17 patients randomized to the placebo group, the 1
5 patients randomized to the MPH group had a significantly greater improvem
ent on the CPT for sustained attention (errors of omission, P = .015) and o
verall index (P = .008) but not for errors of commission (indicative of imp
ulsiveness) nor reaction times. A trend for greater improvement in the MPH
group on a measure of verbal memory failed to reach statistical significanc
e. No trend was observed far MPH effective ness in improving learning of a
word association task. No significant side effects from MPH were observed.
Conclusion: MPH resulted In a statistically significant improvement on meas
ures of attention abilities that cannot be explained by placebo or practice
effects. (C) 2001 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.