We implemented statistical models of Bayesian inference that included direc
t and maternal genetic effects for genetic parameter estimation of categori
cal traits by Gibbs sampling. The estimation errors and variances of estima
tes of animal versus sire and maternal grandsire models, of linear versus t
hreshold models, of single-trait versus multiple-trait models, and of treat
ing herd-year-season as fixed versus random effects in the model were compa
red. The results indicated that linear models yielded biased estimates of g
enetic parameters for categorical traits. The animal model was improper for
analysis of categorical traits using a threshold model and the Gibbs sampl
er. Moreover, linear versus threshold models and animal versus sire-materna
l grandsire models resulted in larger Monte Carlo errors and increased auto
-correlations among posterior samples. Treating herd-year-seasons as random
effects in the threshold models decreased the Monte Carlo error, auto-corr
elations, and the variances of estimates. Efficiency of the single-trait th
reshold sire model, as measured by the variance of the estimates, was lower
than for a multiple-trait model that included a correlated continuous trai
t, but both estimates were unbiased. Therefore, the threshold single-trait
sire and maternal grandsire model is a feasible alternative to the multiple
-trait model for analysis of variance components of categorical traits affe
cted by direct and maternal genetic factors.