Following the development of tests for hepatitis C virus and hepatitis E vi
rus infection, it became clear that there remained cases of hepatitis that
were non-A-E. Such cases provided impetus for the search for additional hep
atitis viruses and, by using molecular techniques, several candidates were
identified. An enteric agent responsible for sporadic non-A and non-E hepat
itis was tentatively called hepatitis F virus. However, the lack of any cor
roborating reports has cast doubt on its status as a true hepatitis virus.
Two groups independently reported the isolation of a blood-borne virus, des
ignated as hepatitis G virus (HGV) and GB virus C (GBV-C) by their respecti
ve discoverers. They were later shown to be isolates of the same virus. Whi
le the virus has a high prevalence in cases of non-A-E hepatitis, it also h
as a high prevalence in the appropriate control groups and convincing evide
nce for its replication in the liver is lacking. Another possible hepatitis
virus, TT virus, was discovered in the blood of a patient with post-transf
usion non-A-E hepatitis. By using PCR primers designed to overcome the high
nucleotide sequence divergence, TT virus was found to be ubiquitous with a
worldwide distribution. A disease association is thus unlikely. Most recen
tly, a DNA virus designated as SEN-V has been announced as a major cause of
non-A-E hepatitis. Based on limited data available to researchers, SEN-V i
s the most convincing contender for the new hepatitis virus title. However,
the lessons learnt from the hepatitis virus pretenders will need to be app
lied to SEN-V and any future contenders.