Wv. Mccallister et al., Using intact nerve to bridge peripheral nerve defects: An alternative to the use of nerve grafts, J HAND S-AM, 26A(2), 2001, pp. 315-325
This preliminary study was conducted to determine whether a regenerating pe
ripheral nerve in a rat model can use the epineurium of an intact nerve to
bridge a nerve gap defect. To create the intact nerve bridge a l-cm segment
of the peroneal nerve is resected leaving a gap defect. The proximal and d
istal peroneal nerve stumps are sutured l-cm apart, in an end-to-side fashi
on, to the epineurium of the intact tibial nerve. The following experimenta
l groups were used (n = 12): group A, immediate primary repair of resected
segment; group B, intact nerve bridge technique; group C, nerve autograft;
and group D, gap in situ control. Evaluation 12 weeks after surgery include
d measurement of the tibialis anterior muscle contraction force, axonal cou
nting, wet weight of the tibialis anterior muscle, and histologic examinati
on. The results of this animal study support 3 main conclusions: regenerati
ng axons can use the epineurium of an intact nerve to bridge a gap in nerve
continuity; when using functional recovery to assess regeneration, there i
s no significant difference between standard nerve autografts and the intac
t nerve bridge technique; and based on histologic examination, the intact n
erve bridge technique does not injure the intact tibial nerve used to bridg
e the gap defect. Taken together, the results of this preliminary animal st
udy suggest that the intact nerve bridge technique may be a potential alter
native to standard nerve autografts in appropriate circumstances. Further i
nvestigation in a higher animal model is warranted before considering clini
cal application of the intact nerve bridge technique. (J Hand Surg 2001;26A
:315-325. Copyright (C) 2001 by the American Society for Surgery of the Han
d.).