A. Hatzelmann et C. Schudt, Anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory potential of the novel PDE4 inhibitor roflumilast in vitro, J PHARM EXP, 297(1), 2001, pp. 267-279
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Toxicology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
From a series of benzamide derivatives, roflumilast (3-cyclo-propylmethoxy-
4- difluoromethoxy-N-[3,5-di-chloropyrid-4-yl] benzamide) was identified as
a potent and selective PDE4 inhibitor. It inhibits PDE4 activity from huma
n neutrophils with an IC50 of 0.8 nM without affecting PDE1 (bovine brain),
PDE2 (rat heart), and PDE3 and PDE5 (human platelets) even at 10,000-fold
higher concentrations. Roflumilast is almost equipotent to its major metabo
lite formed in vivo (roflumilast N-oxide) and piclamilast (RP 73401), howev
er, more than 100-fold more potent than rolipram and Ariflo (cilomilast; SB
207499). The anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory potential of roflumila
st and the reference compounds was investigated in various human leukocytes
using cell-specific responses: neutrophils [N-formyl-methyl-leucyl-phenyla
lanine (fMLP)-induced formation of LTB4 and reactive oxygen species (ROS)],
eosinophils (fMLP- and C5a-induced ROS formation), monocytes, monocyte-der
ived macrophages, and dendritic cells (lipopolysaccharide- induced tumor ne
crosis factor-alpha synthesis), and CD4+ T cells (anti-CD3/anti-CD28 monocl
onal antibody-stimulated proliferation, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, and interferon-ga
mma release). Independent of the cell type and the response investigated, t
he corresponding IC values (for half-maximum inhibition) of roflumilast wer
e within a narrow range (2-21 nM), very similar to roflumilast N-oxide (3-4
0 nM) and piclamilast (2-13 nM). In contrast, cilomilast (40-3000 nM) and r
olipram (10-600 nM) showed greater differences with the highest potency for
neutrophils. Compared with neutrophils and eosinophils, representing the t
erminal inflammatory effector cells, the relative potency of roflumilast an
d its N-oxide for monocytes, CD4+ T cells, and dendritic cells is substanti
ally higher compared with cilomilast and rolipram, probably reflecting an i
mproved immunomodulatory potential. The efficacy of roflumilast in vitro an
d in vivo (see accompanying article in this issue) suggests that roflumilas
t will be useful in the treatment of chronic inflammatory disorders such as
asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.