M. Schlesinger et C. Heldman, Gender gap or gender gaps? New perspectives on support for government action and policies, J POLIT, 63(1), 2001, pp. 59-92
This paper clarifies the theoretical bases for expecting women to be more s
upportive of government programs than are men. We identify several factors
not developed in past literature: (1) differences in emotional responses to
social problems, (2) gendered differences in the awareness of those proble
ms among one's own kin, (3) differences in the perceived fairness of existi
ng social institutions, (4) differences in the perceived efficacy of govern
ment programs, and (5) variations in the preferred form that those programs
should take. Testing hypotheses using data from a 1995 survey of public op
inion covering five policy domains, we find that the gender gap in these do
mains is substantial, comparable to that associated with race and partisans
hip. These differences are attributable in part to factors identified previ
ously in the literature-such as gendered differences in perceived opportuni
ty-but are also affected by differences between men and women in the percei
ved efficacy of government programs (e.g., the extent of fraud and abuse) a
nd differences in the preferred form those programs should take.