Evaluation of interoperator variance in shunt fraction calculation after transcolonic scintigraphy for diagnosis of portosystemic shunts in dogs and cats
Vf. Samii et al., Evaluation of interoperator variance in shunt fraction calculation after transcolonic scintigraphy for diagnosis of portosystemic shunts in dogs and cats, J AM VET ME, 218(7), 2001, pp. 1116-1119
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Veterinary Medicine/Animal Health
Journal title
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
Objective-To determine interoperator variance in shunt fraction calculation
.
Design-Case series.
Sample Population-101 transrectal portoscintigraphic studies.
Procedure-Results of dynamic portoscintigraphic studies were reviewed by 4
radiologists without knowledge of signalment, history, or medical profile.
Results were judged to be negative or positive on the basis of the dynamic
scan. Composite images were formulated, and hand-drawn regions of interest
were determined for the heart and liver. Time-activity curves were generate
d, time-zero points were selected, curves were integrated during a 10-secon
d interval, and shunt fractions were calculated.
Results-Radiologists were in agreement regarding positive versus negative r
esults for 99 of 101 studies. Interoperator variance in shunt fraction calc
ulation ranged from 0.4 to 59.6%. For 51 studies with positive results, var
iance ranged from 2.5 to 59.6% (mean +/- SD, 22.8 +/- 14.5%); differences a
mong reviewers were significant. For 48 studies with negative results, vari
ance in shunt fraction ranged from 0.4 to 25.9% (mean, 5.3 +/- 5.8%); signi
ficant differences among reviewers were not detected. Shunt fraction calcul
ations were not exactly reproducible among radiologists in 94 and 100% of s
tudies with negative or positive results, respectively.
Conclusions and Clinical Relevance-Results suggest that shunt fraction valu
es are not reproducible among operators. Range in variability was greater i
n studies with positive results. This factor may be of particular clinical
importance in reassessment of patients after incomplete shunt ligation.