This study develops a dual-routines view of the dynamic value of hierarchy,
and tests it against the implicit null hypothesis that hierarchy merely pr
ovides static advantages over markets. The view holds that hierarchical man
agers perform two roles that create value for firms in perpetuity-an admini
strative role of enforcing operational routine, and an entrepreneurial role
of executing a metaroutine that continually revises operational routine to
keep pace with changes in the environment. The test consists of a natural
experiment comparing the behavior and performance of establishments that le
ave a franchise, "lose their hierarchical managers," with those that remain
.
I find support for the view. in the absence of the franchisor, establishmen
t behavior drifts from the operational routine, and establishments fail to
adopt innovation. Both responses lead to significant decay in performance.
Thus hierarchical managers are necessary to actively enforce routine, even
after the routine been assimilated, and to introduce innovation, even in th
is unique setting of perfect incentives.