Speed of information processing, psychometric intelligence: and time estimation as an index of cognitive load

Citation
A. Fink et Ac. Neubauer, Speed of information processing, psychometric intelligence: and time estimation as an index of cognitive load, PERS INDIV, 30(6), 2001, pp. 1009-1021
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology
Journal title
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES
ISSN journal
01918869 → ACNP
Volume
30
Issue
6
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1009 - 1021
Database
ISI
SICI code
0191-8869(20010419)30:6<1009:SOIPPI>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
The mental speed approach to human intelligence suggests that the speed of information processing is a basic constituent of individual differences in human intelligence as indicated by consistently found negative correlations between the speed of information processing in elementary cognitive tasks (ECTs) and psychometric intelligence. A new, encouraging approach to assess the cognitive demand of a person is the method of subjective time estimati on (STE) in performing cognitive tasks. The present paper describes an empi rical investigation regarding the usefulness of this method as an index of cognitive load. Furthermore the relationship between mental speed, STE and psychometric intelligence was examined within one and the same experiment. Ninety-seven participants worked on two paper-and-pencil tests for the asse ssment of their speed of information processing and after completing a test half in each condition of both tests they were required to judge the time needed for carrying out the given tasks. For the assessment of intelligence Raven's APM were administered. As expected, the reaction time (RT) measure s correlate negatively (up to -0.62), and the STE-measures correlate positi vely (up to 0.48) with psychometric intelligence. Although in the expected negative direction, the correlations between RT- and STE-measures were rath er low (up to -0.36). From a multiple regression analysis it can be conclud ed that mental speed and STE reflect different sources of intellectual vari ance. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.