Antireductionist philosophers have argued for higher-order classifications
of qualia that locate consciousness outside the scope of conventional scien
tific explanations, viz., by classifying qualia as intrinsic, basic, or sub
jective properties, antireductionists distinguish qualia from extrinsic, co
mplex, and objective properties, and thereby distinguish conscious mental s
tates from the possible explananda of functionalist or physicalist explanat
ions. I argue that, in important respects, qualia are intrinsic, basic, and
subjective properties of conscious mental states, and that, contrary to an
tireductionists' suggestions, these higher-order classifications are compat
ible with qualia reduction. I demonstrate this compatibility by examining t
he putative higher-order properties of qualia and comparing them to the hig
her-order properties characteristic of connectionist networks approximate (
in intertheoretic terms) the putative higher-order properties of qualia suf
ficiently well to conclude that qualia reductionism can (1) accommodate cla
ims that qualia are intrinsic, basic, and subjective properties, and (2) ex
plain the motivating intuitions for those claims generated by inverted, abs
ent, and alien qualia thought experiments. In this way I argue that (approx
imate versions of) the putative higher-order classifications of qualia not
only fail to defeat qualia reduction but, ironically, turn out to support i
t.