The present study assessed whether apologies, given when an implicit offens
e is committed, are a product of the perpetrator's attributions of blamewor
thiness or merely scripted, sympathetic responses given without discriminat
ion. 139 university students were manipulated to commit an implicit offense
, accidental bodily con tact with a confederate. The attributions that the
perpetrator or student made for the incident were then recorded. The partic
ipants' attributions for the offense played a negligible role in predicting
the elicitation of an apology. However, the participants' sympathy and des
ire to help the victim were somewhat associated with whether an apology wou
ld be delivered. Results suggest that apologies are not necessarily admissi
ons of blameworthiness but may be in many cases scripted and or sympathetic
responses.