In this paper two experiments support and amplify Coil and Cell's 1994 Prog
ressively Finer Attributes Theory of Memory Trace Development. Important to
the current paper are five propositions of this theory. (1) The memory tra
ce develops along an attribute dimension from coarse/general to fine/specif
ic attributes. (2) Forgetting is a reverse movement from fine to coarse as
increasingly less fine attributes are lost. (3) A memory trace consists of
a bundle of defining attributes and relating attributes. There are no const
raints on the type of attribute included in the attribute bundle or in the
order of types acquired. The trace name is defined by the attribute bundle
it represents. (4) Access to any defining attribute of a memory trace gives
full access to all other attributes of the trace bundle. (5) In the early
phases of trace development the attributes are preeminent in recall bur, as
familiarity with a to-be-learned item increases, the attributes become inc
reasingly cohesive and the name assumes preeminence. As forgetting progress
es, there is a return to the original state (attributes are preeminent). Ex
p. 1 supports Propositions 3 and 4 and Exp. 2 supports Propositions 3 and 5
. Both experiments provide validation of Propositions 1 and 2 beyond that i
n prior work. The authors present arguments that the coarse-to-fine movemen
t of the Progressively Finer Attributes Theory is the mechanism by which Le
vels of Processing operates.