Breast electron boost planning: Comparison of CT and US

PURPOSE: To compare computed tomography (CT) with ultrasonography (US) for depiction of the biopsy cavity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two consecutive patients who underwent radiat ion therapy following lumpectomy with a planned electron boost were examine d. At the time of simulation for whole-breast radiation therapy, all patien ts underwent planning CT (CT 1) at 3-mm section intervals. At the time of e lectron boost simulation, US was performed to define the biopsy cavity. In 17 cases, a second CT examination (CT 2) was performed at the time of elect ron boost simulation. CT and US studies were reviewed jointly and assigned a cavity visualization score (CVS) of 1 (cavity not visualized) to 5 tall c avity margins clearly defined). RESULTS: The median CVS at CT 1 was 5; at CT 2, 4; and at US, 4. For patien ts who underwent all three studies, the median CVS at CT 1 was 5; at CT 2, 4; and at US, 4. Factors related to CVS at CT 1 were homogeneous versus het erogeneous appearance (score, 5 vs 4), surgery-to-CT interval (less than or equal to 30 days, 5; 31-60 days, 4; >60 days, 4), and cavity size (>15 cm( 3), 5; <15 cm(3), 4). In all cases, cavity volume decreased somewhat during the CT 1-to-CT 2 interval. CONCLUSION: CT performed at the time of whole-breast simulation can be used to plan electron boost fields, with cavity visualization similar to that a t US.