In traditional bootstrap applications the size of a bootstrap sample equals
the parent sample size, n say. Recent studies have shown that using a boot
strap sample size different from n may sometimes provide a more satisfactor
y solution. In this paper we apply the latter approach to correct for cover
age error in construction of bootstrap confidence bounds. We show that the
coverage error of a bootstrap percentile method confidence bound, which is
of order O(n(-1/2)) typically, can be reduced to O(n(-1)) by use of an opti
mal bootstrap sample size. A simulation study is conducted to illustrate ou
r findings, which also suggest that the new method yields intervals of shor
ter length and greater stability compared to competitors of similar coverag
e accuracy.