This article critically examines the ways in which primatologists account f
or their research. Based on a series of unstructured interviews, it argues
that the location of primates at the boundary between Western conceptions o
f nature and culture or human and animal has materially affected how primat
ologists talk about their research, what they find possible to write about
in their research, and where they choose to publish their research. Through
the discussion of a number of related topics (e.g., popular science, socio
biology, the potentially distinctive nature of nonhuman primates as objects
of research), it outlines the reflexive nature of primatologists' response
to the cultural[positioning of their research subjects.