Is it possible to simulate physiologic loading conditions by applying puremoments? A comparison of in vivo and in vitro load components in an internal fixator

Citation
Hj. Wilke et al., Is it possible to simulate physiologic loading conditions by applying puremoments? A comparison of in vivo and in vitro load components in an internal fixator, SPINE, 26(6), 2001, pp. 636-642
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Neurology
Journal title
SPINE
ISSN journal
03622436 → ACNP
Volume
26
Issue
6
Year of publication
2001
Pages
636 - 642
Database
ISI
SICI code
0362-2436(20010315)26:6<636:IIPTSP>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
Study Design. Loads acting in an internal fixator measured in vitro under t he application of pure moments such as those commonly used for implant test ing and basic research were compared with loads measured in 10 patients in vivo. Objectives. To investigate whether these recommended loading conditions are valid by comparing in vivo measurements and those obtained in an in vitro experiment. Summary of Background Data. Pure bending moments are often preferred as loa ding conditions for spinal in vitro testing, either for implant testing or basic research. The advantage of this loading pattern is that the bending m oment is uniform along the multisegmental specimen. However, functional loa ding of the spine by muscles or external loads subjects the spine to a comb ination of forces and moments. Methods. In an in vivo experiment, loads acting on an internal spinal fixat or in 10 patients were determined before and after anterior interbody fusio n during flexion, extension, left and right lateral bending, and left and r ight axial twisting of the upper body with the patient standing. For compar ison, an equivalent in vitro data set was created with 7 human lumbar speci mens in which the same type of fixator was used. All specimens were tested under the application of pure bending moments in the three main motion plan es in the intact state with fixator, after corpectomy, and with bone graft. Results. Consistent qualitative agreement between in vivo and in vitro meas urements for the loads acting in the internal spinal fixator were found for axial rotation and lateral bending. For flexion and extension, reasonable agreement was found only for the intact spines with fixators. After corpect omy and after inserting a bone graft, the median values for axial force and bending moment in the sagittal plane in vitro did not agree with in vivo m easurements. An axial preload in the in vitro experiment slightly increased the axial compression force and flexion bending moment in the fixators. Conclusions, The application of pure moments to intact lumbar spinal specim ens in vitro produces forces and moments in implants comparable with loads observed in vivo. During basic research on intact specimens or implant test ing involving a removed disc or corpectomy, muscle forces are necessary to simulate realistic conditions.