Lhv. Vanderwoude et al., MECHANICAL ADVANTAGE IN WHEELCHAIR LEVER PROPULSION - EFFECT ON PHYSICAL STRAIN AND EFFICIENCY, Journal of rehabilitation research and development, 34(3), 1997, pp. 286-294
In this experimental study on a prototype lever-propelled wheelchair,
the effect of a range of mechanical advantages (MA) on physical strain
, oxygen uptake, energy cost, mechanical efficiency, stroke frequency
and perceived exertion was examined. Nine out of 10 male nonwheelchair
users successfully performed five submaximal tests on a motor-driven
treadmill in a prototype bi-manual asynchronous lever-propelled tricyc
le. Each test contained the same protocol, but made use of one of the
five different MAs. In every test the inclination level increased by 1
% every third minute, starting on 0% up to 3%. The velocity was kept c
onstant at 0.97 m.s(-1). Variables measured included oxygen uptake, mi
nute ventilation, respiratory exchange ratio, heart rate, and stroke f
requency. Analysis for repeated measures was conducted on the main fac
tors slope and MA and their interaction. Additional analysis include a
multiple regression analysis. All statistics were conducted with a p<
0.05 level of significance. MA had a significant effect (p<0.05) on ox
ygen uptake, energy cost, mechanical efficiency, and stroke frequency.
These results suggest that the implementation of a range of MAs on a
lever-propelled wheelchair may accommodate different external conditio
ns (slope, climatic, surface conditions. sports, and recreational cond
itions) and different user groups more readily. This may improve the s
ocial radius of action and freedom of mobility of individuals confined
to wheelchairs.