Malaria is one of the most important parasitic diseases especially in tropi
cal areas. Over 300 million people are affected and the condition causes 1-
3 million deaths each year. It is transmitted by the bite of infected Anoph
eles mosquitoes. Although Korea was declared to be free of Malaria by the W
HO in 1979, malaria re-emergence has been apparent since 1993 amongst soldi
ers located near the De-Militarized Zone (DMZ) in the northern part of the
country.
Conventional microscopic examination of thin and thick blood films demonstr
ates the presence of the parasite and thus this method has been used to con
firm the diagnosis of malaria, but it is a labor-intensive procedure and re
lies upon subjective interpretation. To overcome these limitations, fast an
d reliable methods for malaria detection have been recently introduced. In
this study, we compared three kinds of antibody detection kits and one bioc
hemical test kit that determines the presence of Plasmodium lactate dehydro
genase (LDH) with conventional peripheral blood smears. The antibody detect
ion methods examined were, two rapid test pack format methods and a single
microplate format enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit, as manufac
tured by Korean companies.
The sensitivities of the three commercial antibody detection kits in the ea
rly stage of malaria were 70.8%, 77.4%, and 63.6%, their corresponding spec
ificities 90.5%, 91.8%, and 80.9%, and their accuracies 87.6%, 87.0%, and 7
6.7%. The sensitivity and specificity of the pLDH assay were 100% apiece an
d the results were in 100% concordance with the microscopy of thick blood f
ilms.
Thus, the pLDH assay may be used as an alternative for conventional microsc
opic blood film examination, especially in emergency situations when prompt
treatment is necessary.