Objective: Despite overall good clinical results, cardiac surgery in h
igh risk patients, such as those with poor left ventricular function o
r heavily hypertrophied myocardium, is still challenging. This study w
as designed to assess the efficacy of warm blood cardioplegia (WBC) in
these two subgroups of patients. Methods: Fifty-two patients, with an
ejection fraction less than 50%, who underwent surgical revasculariza
tion, and 36 patients, with marked left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH),
who were operated on for aortic valve replacement (AVR), were consecu
tively studied. All of them received continuous retrograde 'warm' bloo
d cardioplegia. Results were assessed on clinical outcomes and compare
d with those predicted from a risk-stratifying index which has been pr
eviously validated in a large multicenter population-based study (Onta
rio score). Results: For cardiac revascularization, the rates of overa
ll hospital mortality. Q-wave infarctions and inotropic use were respe
ctively 5.8%, 9.6% and 21.1%, comparing favorably with those of the On
tario Group. For aortic valve replacement, the incidence of hospital m
ortality and Q-wave infarction was 2.8%. Conclusions: By virtue of the
study design, these data cannot conclusively establish the superiorit
y of warm blood cardioplegia over other methods of myocardial protecti
on. However, they support the safety of this technique, and suggest th
at these subgroups of high risk patients might represent the elective
indication for aerobic arrest. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science B.V.