Differentiation between primary and secondary Raynaud's phenomenon: a prospective study comparing nailfold capillaroscopy using an ophthalmoscope or stereomicroscope

Citation
Hj. Anders et al., Differentiation between primary and secondary Raynaud's phenomenon: a prospective study comparing nailfold capillaroscopy using an ophthalmoscope or stereomicroscope, ANN RHEUM D, 60(4), 2001, pp. 407-409
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Rheumatology,"da verificare
Journal title
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES
ISSN journal
00034967 → ACNP
Volume
60
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
407 - 409
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-4967(200104)60:4<407:DBPASR>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
Background-Nailfold capillary microscopy is a routine procedure in the inve stigation of patients with Raynaud's phenomenon (RP). As a standard method, nailfold capillary morphology is inspected with a stereomicroscope to look for capillary abnormalities such as giant loops, avascular areas, and bush y capillaries, which have all been found to be associated with certain conn ective tissue diseases. Aim-To investigate prospectively whether nailfold capillary inspection usin g an ophthalmoscope is of equivalent diagnostic value to standard nailfold capillary microscopy. Method-All the fingers of 26 patients with RP were examined in a blinded fa shion and compared with the final diagnosis one month later. Results-All giant loops, large avascular areas, and bushy capillaries were identified by both methods. The correlation for moderate avascular areas an d crossed capillaries was 0.93 and 0.955 respectively. The correlation for minor abnormalities that do not contribute to the differentiation between p rimary and secondary RP was 0.837 and 0.861 respectively. All patients were classified identically by the two methods. Conclusion-For the evaluation of patients with RP, nailfold capillary morph ology can reliably be assessed with an ophthalmoscope.