From arctic lemmings to adaptive dynamics: Charles Elton's legacy in population ecology

Citation
J. Lindstrom et al., From arctic lemmings to adaptive dynamics: Charles Elton's legacy in population ecology, BIOL REV, 76(1), 2001, pp. 129-158
Citations number
300
Categorie Soggetti
Biology,"Experimental Biology
Journal title
BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS
ISSN journal
14647931 → ACNP
Volume
76
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
129 - 158
Database
ISI
SICI code
1464-7931(200102)76:1<129:FALTAD>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
We shall examine the impact of Charles S. Elton's 1924 article on periodic fluctuations in animal populations on the development of modern population ecology. We argue that his impact has been substantial and that during the past 75 years of research on multi-annual periodic fluctuations in numbers of voles, lemmings, hares, lynx and game animals he has contributed much to the contemporary understanding of the causes and consequences of populatio n regulation. Elton was convinced that the cause of the regular fluctuation s was climatic variation. To support this conclusion, he examined long-term population data then available. Despite his firm belief in a climatic caus e of the self-repeating periodic dynamics which many species display, Elton was insightful and far-sighted enough to outline many of the other hypothe ses since put forward as an explanation for the enigmatic long-term dynamic s of some animal populations. An interesting, but largely neglected aspect in Elton's paper is that it ends with speculation regarding the evolutionar y consequences of periodic population fluctuations. The modern understandin g of these issues will also be scrutinised here. In population ecology, Elt on's 1924 paper has spawned a whole industry of research on populations dis playing multi-annual periodicity. Despite the efforts of numerous research teams and individuals focusing on the origins of multi-annual population cy cles, and despite the early availability of different explanatory hypothese s, we are still lacking rigorous tests of some of these hypotheses and, con sequently, a consensus of the causes of periodic fluctuations in animal pop ulations. Although Elton would have been happy to see so much effort spent on cyclic populations, we also argue that it is unfortunate if this focus o n a special case of population dynamics should distract our attention from more general problems in population and community dynamics.