Long-term arterial cannulation in ICU patients using the radial artery or dorsalis pedis artery

Citation
C. Martin et al., Long-term arterial cannulation in ICU patients using the radial artery or dorsalis pedis artery, CHEST, 119(3), 2001, pp. 901-906
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
CHEST
ISSN journal
00123692 → ACNP
Volume
119
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
901 - 906
Database
ISI
SICI code
0012-3692(200103)119:3<901:LACIIP>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
Study objectives: To evaluate the rate of arterial thrombosis and catheter- related infection following radial artery or dorsalis pedis artery (DPA) ca nnulations lasting greater than or equal to days. Design: Prospective, observational study of two cohorts of ICU patients. Setting: ICU of a university hospital. Patients: In a first group of 131 consecutive patients, the DPA was selecte d for arterial cannulation. In the second group, 134 consecutive patients w ere considered for radial artery cannulation. Measurements and results: In the DPA group, the overall success rate for ca theter placement was 85%. Patients were cannulated for 16 +/- 5 days (mean +/- SD). In the radial artery group, the overall success rate was 97.7% (12 9 of 133 patients; p < 0.0001 vs DPA group). Patients were cannulated for 1 3.3 +/- 4.0 days. In both groups, no signs of ischemia were detected at the clinical examination. In the DPA group, no thrombosis was detected at the angiographic examination in 21 patients (38%), a thrombosis without vessel obstruction was observed in 21 patients (31%), and a thrombosis with vessel obstruction was observed in 21 patients (31%). In the radial artery group, no thrombosis was observed in 31 patients (24%; not significant vs DPA gro up), a partial thrombosis was found in 73 patients (57%), and a total throm bosis With vessel obstruction was found in 25 patients (19%). Two cases of catheter-related infection were observed in the DPA group. In the radial ar tery group, four cases of catheter-related infection were diagnosed vs DPA group (not significant). Conclusions: The rate of serious complications was similar for both sites o f arterial cannulation. Accepting a 12.7% lower rate of successful placemen t, the DPA route provides a safe and easily available alternative when radi al arteries are not accessible.