M. Holyoak et al., WEATHER-INDUCED CHANGES IN MOTH ACTIVITY BIAS MEASUREMENT OF LONG-TERM POPULATION-DYNAMICS FROM LIGHT TRAP SAMPLES, Entomologia experimentalis et applicata, 83(3), 1997, pp. 329-335
Interpretation of light trap catches of moths is complicated by daily
variation in weather that alters flight activity and numbers caught. L
ight trap efficiency is also modified by wind and fog, and daily weath
er may effect absolute abundance (numbers actually present). However,
actograph experiments and other sampling methods suggest that changes
in daily activity are large by comparison to changes in absolute abund
ance. Daily variation in weather (other than wind and fog) is therefor
e a form of sampling error in absolute abundance estimates. We investi
gated the extent of this sampling bias in 26 years of population dynam
ics from 133 moth species. In a subset of 20 noctuid and geometrid spe
cies, daily numbers caught were positively correlated with temperature
in 14 species, and negatively correlated with rainfall in 11 species.
The strength of correlations varied between species, making it diffic
ult to standardize catches to constant conditions. We overcame this by
establishing how weather variation changed with time and duration of
the flight period. Species flying later in the summer and for shorter
periods experienced more variable temperatures, making sampling error
greater for these species. Of the 133 moth species, those with shorter
flight periods had greater population variability and more showed sig
nificant temporal density dependence. However, these effects were weak
, which is encouraging because it suggests that population analyses of
Light trap data largely reflect factors other than sampling error.