Ejr. Van Beek et al., Lung scintigraphy and helical computed tomography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: A meta-analysis, CL APPL T-H, 7(2), 2001, pp. 87-92
To assess the diagnostic value of lung scintigraphy and helical computed to
mography (hCT) in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE), all Engl
ish-language articles that described lung scintigraphy and hCT in patients
with suspected PE were retrieved. Articles were assessed for strength of me
thodology, based on nine a priori-defined criteria. Parameters of diagnosti
c accuracy and results of management studies were calculated and evaluated.
Lung scintigraphy is diagnostic in approximately 50% of patients with susp
ected PE. A normal perfusion scan has a chance of recurrent PE in two of 69
3 patients (0.3%; 95% CI: 0.2-0.4%; fatal in 0.15%). A high-probability lun
g scan is correlated with angiographically proven PE in 308 of 350 patients
(88%; 95% CI: 84-91%). Pulmonary embolism was proven in 385 of 1529 patien
ts (25%; 95% CI: 24-28%) with a nondiagnostic lung scan. Helical CT studies
were compared with angiography and lung scintigraphy in 1171 patients, wit
h a prevalence of PE of 39%. The sensitivity and specificity of hCT was 283
/320 (88%; 95% CI: 83-91%) and 374/408 (92%; 95% CI:89-94%), respectively.
Only one prospective management study using hCT was available. In patients
in whom anticoagulants were withheld based on a normal hCT study, recurrent
thromboembolic events occurred in six of 109 patients (5.5%; 95% CI: 2-12%
), with one fatality (1% 95% CI: 0.02-4.3%). Lung scintigraphy is evaluated
extensively and yields a diagnostic result in 50% of patients. Helical CT
has similar positive predictive value to a high-probability lung scan. Howe
ver, the exact role of hCT in the management of patients with suspected PE
needs to be determined in prospective studies.