M. Schurmann et al., Clinical and physiologic evaluation of stellate ganglion blockade for complex regional pain syndrome type I, CLIN J PAIN, 17(1), 2001, pp. 94-100
Objective: The efficacy of peripheral sympathetic interruption after stella
te ganglion blockade was assessed by a sympathetic function test. Results w
ere compared with clinical signs such as temperature changes, pain reductio
n, and the development of Horner syndrome to evaluate the correlation with
clinical investigations.
Design: Stellate ganglion blockade with local anesthetics was carried out v
ia an anterior paratracheal approach in 33 patients suffering from complex
regional pain syndrome type I. Patients were examined before and after the
procedure. For assessment of sympathetic nervous function, the vasoconstric
tor response to sympathetic stimuli was assessed using laser Doppler flowme
try. Clinical parameters like surface temperature changes (thermography), p
ain relief (visual analogue scale), and Horner syndrome were monitored.
Results: Twenty-three (70%) of 33 patients developed an increase in tempera
ture difference between the treated hand and the contralateral hand of more
than 1.5 degreesC after the procedure, which is a clinical sign of sympath
icolysis. In 48% (n = 11) of these patients, the sympathetic function test
showed an undisturbed sympathetic nervous function. In 10 patients, no sign
ificant increase in temperature difference was observed. Although these pat
ients presented with a normal sympathetic vasoconstrictor response, 4 felt
pain relief of more than 50%, suggesting a placebo effect. Only 7 patients
with pain relief revealed both clinical sympathicolysis and extinguished sy
mpathetic nervous function and qualified for sympathetically maintained pai
n.
Conclusions: Clinical investigation is not reliable in the assessment of st
ellate ganglion blockade. Proof of sympathetically maintained pain based on
pain relief after stellate ganglion blockade is not conclusive.