Comparison of sympathetic modulation induced by single oral doses of mibefradil, amlodipine, and nifedipine in healthy volunteers

Citation
I. Ragueneau et al., Comparison of sympathetic modulation induced by single oral doses of mibefradil, amlodipine, and nifedipine in healthy volunteers, CLIN PHARM, 69(3), 2001, pp. 122-129
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology,"Pharmacology & Toxicology
Journal title
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
ISSN journal
00099236 → ACNP
Volume
69
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
122 - 129
Database
ISI
SICI code
0009-9236(200103)69:3<122:COSMIB>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
Objective: Our objective was to compare the sympathetic modulation induced by oral administration of a single dose of 20 mg of standard nifedipine, of 10 mg of amlodipine, and of 100 mg of mibefradil. Methods: Sixteen healthy male volunteers participated in this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover four-period study. The sympathet ic modulation induced by treatments was evaluated during 24 hours after dru g administration by neurohormonal dosages, hemodynamic parameter measuremen ts, and spectral analysis of heart rate and blood pressure. Results: We observed a significant (P < .05) decrease in diastolic blood pr essure 1 hour after the administration of nifedipine (62 <plus/minus> 9 to 59 +/- 5 mm Hg) with concomitant increases in heart rate (59 +/- 5 to 74 +/ - 8 bpm) and neurohormones (53 +/- 18 to 83 +/- 50 pg/mL for aldosterone, 1 57 +/- 56 to 282 +/- 119 pg/mL for norepinephrine, and 9.8 +/- 5.5 to 40.2 +/- 97.1 pg/mL for active renin). No significant modification of these para meters was observed with amlodipine and mibefradil, except an isolated incr ease of norepinephrine plasma level 2 hours after the administration of mib efradil (133.1 +/- 67.1 to 210.9 +/- 92.5 pg/mL). The spectral analysis ove r 24 hours of Mayer waves of systolic blood pressure did not show any signi ficant change over time in the different groups. When the analysis was perf ormed during the first 4 hours after treatment administration, we observed a decrease of Mayer waves of systolic blood pressure with nifedipine (2.21 +/- 1.45 mm Hg-2 versus 3.53 +/- 1.85 mm Hg-2 with placebo). These results indicate that oral single doses of mibefradil and amlodipine do not induce baroreflex-mediated clinical changes in healthy volunteers. The single oral dose of nifedipine resulted in a marked increase in sympathetic tone and a decrease in systolic blood pressure variability early after oral administr ation. Conclusion: Mibefradil, the nondihydropyridine calcium antagonist, exerts m uch less sympathetic stimulation than nifedipine.