Targeting cancer gene therapy to endothelial cells seems to be a rational a
pproach, because (a) a clear correlation exists between proliferation of tu
mor vessels and tumor growth and malignancy, (b) differences of cell membra
ne structures between tumor endothelial cells and normal endothelial cells
exist which could be used for targeting of vectors and (c) tumor endothelia
l cells are accessible to vector vehicles in spite of the peculiarities of
the transvascular and interstitial blood flow in tumors. Based on the knowl
edge on the pharmacokinetics of macromolecules it can be concluded that vec
tors targeting tumor endothelial cells should own a long blood residence ti
me after intravascular application. This precondition seems to be fulfilled
best by vectors exhibiting a slight anionic charge. A long blood residence
time would allow the formation of a high amount of complexes between tumor
endothelial cells and vector particles. Such high amount of complexes shou
ld enable a high transfection rate of tumor endothelial cells. In view of t
heir pharmacokinetic behavior nonviral vectors seem to be more suitable for
in vivo targeting tumor endothelial cells than viral vectors. Specific bin
ding of nonviral vectors to tumor endothelial cells should be enhanced by m
ultifunctional ligands and the transduction efficiency should be improved b
y cationic carriers. Effector genes should encode proteins potent enough to
induce reactions which eliminate the tumor tissue. To be effective to that
degree such proteins should induce self-amplificating antitumor reactions.
Examples for proteins which have the potential to induce such self-amplifi
cating tumor reactions are proteins endowed with antiangiogenic and antipro
liferative activity, enzymes which convert prodrugs into drugs and possibly
also proteins which induce embolization of tumor vessels. The pharmacologi
cal data for such examples are discussed in detail. (C) 2001 Elsevier Scien
ce Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.