Tramadol for the treatment of joint pain associated with osteoarthritis: Arandomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Citation
Rm. Fleischmann et al., Tramadol for the treatment of joint pain associated with osteoarthritis: Arandomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, CURR THER R, 62(2), 2001, pp. 113-128
Citations number
38
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology,"Pharmacology & Toxicology
Journal title
CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL
ISSN journal
0011393X → ACNP
Volume
62
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
113 - 128
Database
ISI
SICI code
0011-393X(200102)62:2<113:TFTTOJ>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
Background: Results from short-term, non-placebo-controlled clinical trials suggest that tramadol is effective as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of joint pain associated with osteoarthritis COA). Objective: We assessed the efficacy and tolerability of tramadol monotherap y versus placebo in the treatment of joint pain associated with OA. Methods: Patients with symptomatic OA of the knee and at least moderate pai n at the end of a 10-day analgesic washout period were randomized to receiv e tramadol or placebo. After a 7-day titration period (50-mg increments eve ry 2 days to a target dosage of 200 mg/d), patients were permitted to incre ase their dose up to 400 mg/d as needed for 84 days. Likert scale scores to assess pain intensity (none = 0 to extreme = 4) and pain relief (complete relief = 3 to severely worse = -3) as well as Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) OA Index scores were obtained at visits on days 14, 28 , 56, and 91 of the study. Patient and investigator global assessments of t reatment effectiveness were recorded at the final visit (day 91 or at the t ime of discontinuation). Results: Baseline characteristics were similar for the tramadol (n = 63) an d placebo (n = 66) groups; move than half of the patients (mean age 62.5 ye ars) were women (65.1% and 59.1% in the tramadol and placebo groups, respec tively). Mean final pain intensity scores were 2.10 in the tramadol group a nd 2.48 in the placebo group (P = 0.082, analysis of covariance). Tramadol was significantly more effective than placebo for all secondary outcomes: m ean final pain intensity scores (P = 0.045, t test), pain relief scores (P = 0.004), patient and investigator global assessments (P = 0.038 and P = 0. 001, respectively), median time to failure of effectiveness (P = 0.042), an d all WOMAC scores (P less than or equal to 0.033). Fourteen tramadol, and 10 placebo patients discontinued the study because of adverse events (AEs). Other reasons for discontinuation included lack of efficacy (26 tramadol a nd 43 placebo patients) and patient choice (10 tramadol and 11 placebo pati ents). The most common AEs during tramadol therapy were nausea, constipatio n, dizziness, Pruritus, and headache; no serious AEs, seizures, or cases of abuse were reported in the tramadol group. Conclusion: Tramadol may be useful as monotherapy in the treatment of joint pain associated with OA.