PURPOSE: Both negative and positive influences of mutant p53 on treatment o
utcome hare been reported, and we present here a meta-analysis of published
studies where outcome was reported for defined treatment groups. METHODS:
We identified articles on the effect of p53 status by treatment modality, e
xcluding those not stratified by method of treatment. A common hazard ratio
was estimated from studies that reported a multivariate analysis. We also
estimated the numbers of patients expressing the endpoint at the mean or me
dian follow-up time and calculated a pooled odds ratio. RESULTS: Twenty-eig
ht articles were evaluable (23 using immunohistochemistry to detect overexp
ression of p53 and 8 using DNA sequencing), for a total of 4,416 patients.
For patients treated with surgery only, the immunohistochemistry studies sh
owed a significant influence of p53 status on disease-free survival and a m
arginally significant influence on overall survival. In the studies using D
NA sequencing, by contrast, there was a significant influence of p53 mutati
ons on overall survival, but not disease-free survival. For patients treate
d with surgery and radiotherapy, the influence of p53 status on disease-fre
e survival was either insignificant or marginally significant, depending on
test used; there was no influence on overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Althou
gh this pooled analysis of published studies where treatment was accounted
for shows that there is a borderline significant hazard associated with p53
overexpression or mutation vs. p53 wild-type, it is unlikely that p53 can
be applied in a routine clinical setting along side factors such as T stage
, nodal status, and residual tumor, whose prognostic value is much stronger
.