There is an inherent tension between a dominant state's role as a hegemon a
nd its role as a great power. Hegemons have the material capabilities to ac
t unilaterally, yet they cannot remain hegemons if they do so at the expens
e of the system that they are trying to lead. Thus there is a contradiction
between the propensity for a powerful state to cake unilateral action in p
romoting its self-defined interest and its desire to maintain long-term sys
temic stability. This tension between parochial interest and international
responsibility creates a phenomenon called the 'paradox of hegemony'. This
article conceptualizes this as a form of 'role strain' in which hegemons ar
e torn between their conflicting roles as great powers and systemic leaders
. It illustrates these points by examining the tensions that have long defi
ned the US relationship with the United Nations.