Z. Gaci et al., Prognostic impact of cathepsin D and c-erbB-2 oncoprotein in a subgroup ofnode-negative breast cancer patients with low histological grade tumors, INT J ONCOL, 18(4), 2001, pp. 793-800
Some node-negative breast cancer patients, with initially good prognosis, r
elapse from their cancer and are poorly identified. In the present study, b
ased on prospective data of 197 tumors, we measured cathepsin D (cath D, n=
197), pS2 protein (n=125), c-erbB-2 oncoprotein (n=100) and epidermal growt
h factor receptor (EGF-R, n=99) to better define the risk of relapse of nod
e-negative patients in comparison with that defined by the clinical and his
tological factors, The median follow-up in surviving patients was 75 months
. Univariate analysis indicated that patients with histological grade III t
umors (the Scarff, Bloom and Richardson classification) had a much poorer p
rognosis than those with histological grade I or II tumors (P=0.0027 for re
lapse-free survival and P=0.0156 for overall survival). When the population
of node-negative patients was divided by tertiles, high cath D levels show
ed a significant association with an early relapse (P=0.0316). Using cut-of
f values, patients with high cath D (greater than or equal to 25 pmol/mg pr
otein) or c-erbB-2 oncoprotein (greater than or equal to4 Human Neu Unit/mu
g protein) levels, had a significant worse relapse-fi ee survival(P=0.0147
and 0.0417, respectively). No prognostic information was supported by pS2 p
rotein or EGF-R measurements. In multivariate analysis, histological grade,
cath D and c-erbB-2 oncoprotein remained independent predictors of recurre
nce (P=0.005, 0.0361 and 0.0321, respectively). By combining low levels of
cath D and c-erbB-2 oncoprotein in histological grade I or II tumors, we id
entified a subgroup of patients with a 100% relapse-free survival probabili
ty at 6 years of follow-up. Moreover, the subgroup of patients with histolo
gical grade I or II tumors and high values of both cath D and c-erbB-2 onco
protein showed a prognosis as poor as the subgroup defined by histological
grade III alone, respectively 66% and 70% relapse-free survival at 6 years
of follow-up. In conclusion, the combination of conventional prognostic fac
tor (histological grade) and biochemical factors (cath D and c-erbB-2 oncop
rotein) enabled us to identify, in this preliminary study, a subgroup of pa
tients having an increased risk of relapse in a group (node-negative patien
ts with low histological grade tumors) considered as good prognosis.