Two steam surface condenser design methods are compared: that of the Hear E
xchange Institute Standards and a three-dimensional steady-state numerical
model for simulating the flow, the heat and the mass transfer in this type
of industrial equipment. In the numerical model, the study of the shell flo
w is carried out using a single-phase approach, the presence of the tubes i
s simulated through the porosity factor, and the heat and mass transfer pro
cesses are modelled using empirical correlations. The variables condenser p
ressure and overall heat transfer coefficient are analysed applying both me
thods. The influence on these variables of the steam mass flow rate from th
e turbine exhaust, the venting outlet pressure, the tube cleanliness factor
, the inlet water temperature, and the water velocity is studied. The overa
ll heat transfer coefficient is under-predicted with the numerical model, i
ts value being 4.5-8.5% lower than that obtained using the Heat Exchange in
stitute Standards method. (C) 2001 Editions scientifiques et medicales Else
vier SAS.