Prolonged enoxaparin therapy to prevent venous thromboembolism after primary hip or knee replacement

Citation
Pc. Comp et al., Prolonged enoxaparin therapy to prevent venous thromboembolism after primary hip or knee replacement, J BONE-AM V, 83A(3), 2001, pp. 336-345
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Ortopedics, Rehabilitation & Sport Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME
ISSN journal
00219355 → ACNP
Volume
83A
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
336 - 345
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-9355(200103)83A:3<336:PETTPV>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
Background: Patients undergoing hip or knee joint replacement are at risk f or venous thromboembolic complications for up to twelve weeks postoperative ly. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a prolonged post-hospital regim en of enoxaparin, a low-molecular-weight heparin, in this patient populatio n. Methods: Following elective total hip or knee replacement, 968 patients rec eived subcutaneous enoxaparin (30 mg twice daily) for seven to ten days, an d 873 were then randomized to receive three weeks of double-blind outpatien t treatment with either enoxaparin (40 mg once daily) or a placebo. The pri mary efficacy end point was the prevalence of objectively confirmed venous thromboembolism or symptomatic pulmonary embolism during the double-blind p hase of treatment. Results: Of the 873 randomized patients, 435 underwent elective total hip r eplacement and 438 underwent elective total knee replacement. Enoxaparin wa s superior to the placebo in reducing the prevalence of venous thromboembol ism in patients treated with hip replacement: 8.0% (eighteen) of the 224 pa tients treated with enoxaparin had venous thromboembolism compared with 23. 2% (forty-nine) of the 211 patients treated with the placebo (p < 0.001; od ds ratio, 3.62; 95% confidence interval, 2.00 to 6.55; relative risk reduct ion, 65.5%). Enoxaparin had no significant:benefit in the patients treated with knee replacement: thirty-eight (17.5%) of the 217 patients treated wit h enoxaparin had venous thromboembolism compared with forty-six (20.8%) of the 221 patients treated with the placebo (p = 0.380; odds ratio, 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 0.76 to 2.02; relative risk reduction, 15.9%). Sympto matic pulmonary embolism developed in three patients, one with a hip replac ement and two with a knee replacement; all had received the placebo. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of hemorrhagic episodes or other types of toxicity between the enoxaparin and placebo-treated groups. Conclusions: Prolonging enoxaparin thromboprophylaxis following hip replace ment for a total of four weeks provided therapeutic benefit, by reducing th e prevalence of venous thromboembolism, without compromising safety. A simi lar benefit was not observed in patients treated with knee replacement.