Pc. Comp et al., Prolonged enoxaparin therapy to prevent venous thromboembolism after primary hip or knee replacement, J BONE-AM V, 83A(3), 2001, pp. 336-345
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Ortopedics, Rehabilitation & Sport Medicine","da verificare
Background: Patients undergoing hip or knee joint replacement are at risk f
or venous thromboembolic complications for up to twelve weeks postoperative
ly. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a prolonged post-hospital regim
en of enoxaparin, a low-molecular-weight heparin, in this patient populatio
n.
Methods: Following elective total hip or knee replacement, 968 patients rec
eived subcutaneous enoxaparin (30 mg twice daily) for seven to ten days, an
d 873 were then randomized to receive three weeks of double-blind outpatien
t treatment with either enoxaparin (40 mg once daily) or a placebo. The pri
mary efficacy end point was the prevalence of objectively confirmed venous
thromboembolism or symptomatic pulmonary embolism during the double-blind p
hase of treatment.
Results: Of the 873 randomized patients, 435 underwent elective total hip r
eplacement and 438 underwent elective total knee replacement. Enoxaparin wa
s superior to the placebo in reducing the prevalence of venous thromboembol
ism in patients treated with hip replacement: 8.0% (eighteen) of the 224 pa
tients treated with enoxaparin had venous thromboembolism compared with 23.
2% (forty-nine) of the 211 patients treated with the placebo (p < 0.001; od
ds ratio, 3.62; 95% confidence interval, 2.00 to 6.55; relative risk reduct
ion, 65.5%). Enoxaparin had no significant:benefit in the patients treated
with knee replacement: thirty-eight (17.5%) of the 217 patients treated wit
h enoxaparin had venous thromboembolism compared with forty-six (20.8%) of
the 221 patients treated with the placebo (p = 0.380; odds ratio, 1.24; 95%
confidence interval, 0.76 to 2.02; relative risk reduction, 15.9%). Sympto
matic pulmonary embolism developed in three patients, one with a hip replac
ement and two with a knee replacement; all had received the placebo. There
was no significant difference in the prevalence of hemorrhagic episodes or
other types of toxicity between the enoxaparin and placebo-treated groups.
Conclusions: Prolonging enoxaparin thromboprophylaxis following hip replace
ment for a total of four weeks provided therapeutic benefit, by reducing th
e prevalence of venous thromboembolism, without compromising safety. A simi
lar benefit was not observed in patients treated with knee replacement.