M. Bhandari et al., The efficacy of low-pressure lavage with different irrigating solutions toremove adherent bacteria from bone, J BONE-AM V, 83A(3), 2001, pp. 412-419
Citations number
47
Categorie Soggetti
Ortopedics, Rehabilitation & Sport Medicine","da verificare
Background: Recent studies have suggested that high-pressure irrigation may
have adverse effects on bone. However, the use of low-pressure irrigation
may not remove all adherent bacteria from bone. The type of irrigating solu
tion may be an important factor in the removal of adherent bacteria with pu
lsatile lavage. In this study, we compared the effects of various irrigatin
g solutions on the number and function of osteoblasts and osteoclasts and w
e examined the effectiveness of these solutions in removing adherent bacter
ia from bone.
Methods: To examine the effect of irrigating solutions on the number and ac
tivity of osteoblasts, we isolated calvarial cells from newborn C57Bl/6 mic
e and exposed the cells to equivalent concentrations of ethanol, povidone-i
odine, liquid soap, antimicrobial wash (50 U/L of bacitracin), or chlorhexi
dine gluconate, for two, ten, or twenty minutes. The cells were then cultur
ed in the presence of bone-nodule-enhancing medium (beta -glycerophosphate
and ascorbic acid) for twenty-one days. The medium was changed every three
or four days. Mineralized nodules were stained with alizarin red S, and ost
eoblasts were stained with a histochemical stain for alkaline phosphatase.
Osteoclasts were identified with tartrate-resistant acid-phosphatase staini
ng. In a second experiment, canine cortical tibiae were contaminated with S
taphylococcus aureus for six hours and subjected to different irrigating so
lutions with or without low-pressure lavage. Bacterial colony-forming units
were quantitated under each set of conditions.
Results: Each solution resulted in a time-dependent decrease in the number
of calvarial osteoblasts and osteoclasts compared with that in the controls
. The 1% soap solution resulted in greater preservation of both alkaline-ph
osphatase activity and bone-nodule formation than did the other solutions.
Moreover, the soap solution preserved the number of osteoclasts to the grea
test extent. The povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine-gluconate solutions resu
lted in the largest decline in bone-nodule formation, alkaline-phosphatase
activity, and number of osteoclasts. Low-pressure pulsatile lavage with the
soap solution removed the most bacteria from the contaminated tibia when c
ompared with either the soap solution alone or low-pressure irrigation with
saline solution.
Conclusions: Our findings suggest that certain solutions may be more effect
ive in removing bacteria from bone than mechanical irrigation with saline s
olution alone. Among the various solutions examined, the soap solution pres
erved the number and activity of osteoblasts the most. Low-pressure lavage
with the soap solution resulted in the greatest removal of adherent bacteri
a from bone.
Clinical Relevance: Meticulous debridement is regarded as the most importan
t initial step in the management of open tibial fractures. The optimal tech
nique for bone debridement should maximize the removal of adherent bacteria
while preserving the structure and function of bone. It has been shown tha
t low-pressure irrigation results in significantly less macroscopic and mic
roscopic damage to bone and is as effective as high-pressure lavage in remo
ving bacteria within three hours after contamination. However, irrigation i
s often delayed beyond three hours. In the current study, we report that de
bridement with low-pressure irrigation and detergent solutions can be effec
tive for up to six hours after contamination.