In this study, patterns of community development were investigated within v
s. outside 'habitats'. These habitats represented five different monospecif
ic assemblages of one of the following species: the brown alga Fucus serrat
us, the red alga Delesseria sanguinea, the green alga Enteromorpha intestin
alis, the seagrass Zostera marina and the blue mussel Mytilus edulis. Natur
al assemblages were allowed to develop on paired artificial substrata-separ
ated by ca. 1 m -within (treatment) vs, outside (control) of habitats. The
same colonizer species settled on treatment and control substrata for given
habitats. However, after 5 months of settlement and post-settlement dynami
cs, their proportional abundance and the structure of treatment and control
assemblages differed in many instances. Variability among replicates of a
given treatment, seperated by up to 50 m, was large, indicating a patchy sp
atial distribution of organisms. Despite this spatial heterogeneity among w
ithin-treatment replicates, analysis of similarity revealed that in most in
stances significantly different assemblages developed between treatments on
a small spatial scale depending on whether substrate were positioned withi
n as compared to outside a, given habitat.
Consequently, the algae, seagrass or mussels constituting a habitat seem to
control the structure of the benthic assemblage developing in their vicini
ty by one or more possible mechanisms: reduction of larval advection, exuda
tion of metabolites that influence settlement and/or post-settlement surviv
al, and/or-in the case of mussel assemblages-predation on larvae.
In addition to spatial variability in larval supply, stochasticity in succe
ssion, substratum heterogeneity, competition and predation effects, this in
vestigation reveals the potential of a further assemblage structuring facto
r: the impact of neighboring organisms. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All
rights reserved.