P. Stevens, Human electrodermal response to remote human monitoring: Classification and analysis of response characteristics, J PARAPSYCH, 64(4), 2000, pp. 391-409
This study reanalyzed datasets from 2 past studies and attempted to identif
y some characteristics of human electrodermal reactions to remote monitorin
g by another human, an aspect of direct mental interaction with living syst
ems (DMILS) research. The objectives were (a) to see if an electrodermal DM
ILS response was similar to a sensory response and, if not, to see if there
were any useful characteristics that could be used to identify the former
and (b) to compare the electrodermal response seen in DMILS with that seen
in reaction to a weak magnetic field, allowing exploration of potential mec
hanisms or physiological response systems that might produce the observed D
MILS effects. No electrodermal activity (EDA) was observed that was obvious
ly comparable to a sensory response, and there was no evidence of a consist
ent difference between activate and calm periods. Consistent between-partic
ipant differences were noted when comparing DMILS responsiveness to resting
EDA.A consistent scale-invariant pattern was found based on the variance o
f EDA, showing significant differences between any type of influence attemp
t and rest periods (p<0.01 and p<0.0002, 2-tailed). This pattern was also s
een in the magnetic field exposure data, possibly indicating similarities b
etween DMILS and magnetic response mechanisms.