The United States and China have vastly different official estimates of the
bilateral trade imbalance. The U.S, figures show that the United States ha
d a merchandise trade deficit of US$68.7 billion vis-a-vis China in 1999 wh
ereas the Chinese figures show that China had a merchandise trade surplus o
f only US$22.4 billion vis-h-vis the United States. There is a difference o
f US$46.3 billion. Which set of figures is right? It turns out that neither
side is completely right. Various factors, such as f.o.b.-c.i.f. adjustmen
ts and treatments of re-exports and re-export markups, complicate the measu
rement of the bilateral trade balance between the United States and China.
One important conclusion that emerges is that while U.S. trade statistics m
ay be more reliable than Chinese trade statistics, even they are not comple
tely accurate. By explicitly taking into account the aforementioned factors
, the discrepancy between the adjusted U.S. and Chinese data on the bilater
al trade balance in 1999 is narrowed from US$46.3 billion to US$4.8 billion
, or approximately 10% of the initial figure. Our best estimate for the tru
e U.S.-China bilateral merchandise trade balance for 1999 is US$47.8 billio
n, in China's favor. If we take into account the trade in services? in whic
h the United States has traditionally enjoyed a surplus, the U.S.-China bil
ateral trade balance may be estimated at approximately US$45 billion in 199
9. Compared with the U.S, trade deficit with Japan (over US$70 billion in 1
999), the U.S.-China trade deficit, appropriately adjusted, is still signif
icantly smaller. (C) 2001 by Academic Press.