Purpose: There is growing interest in preputial reconstruction combined wit
h hypospadias repair. We retrospectively analyzed its results for future de
velopments and patient information.
Materials and Methods: We evaluated 77 boys who underwent distal hypospadia
s repair combined with preputial reconstruction to determine complications,
risks and failures.
Results: At a mean followup of 2.5 years 52 patients had an anatomically no
rmal penis with a normal retractable foreskin, while 25 (33%) presented wit
h a complication. The most common complications were partial dehiscence, an
d fistula of the prepuce and urethra. There was a complication of the recon
structed foreskin only in 16 cases (21%), a combined problem with the recon
structed foreskin and reconstructed urethra in 7 (9%), and a problem with t
he reconstructed urethra in 2 (3%). Of the 25 patients with complications 1
9 underwent reoperation with closure of the fistula or dehiscence and 5 wer
e circumcised, while in 1 the parents accepted the minor cosmetic problem a
nd refused reoperation.
Conclusions: Preputial repair combined with hypospadias repair may lead to
anatomically correct reconstruction of the penis at the cost of a 33% compl
ication rate. Parents are informed about this risk and to date in 15% of al
l boys with distal hypospadias the parents have elected preputial reconstru
ction.