Some economists have advocated the use of measures of genetic dissimilarity
to guide species preservation priorities. It is argued here that such poli
cies are: 1) possible for only a very small number of species for which dat
a are available; 2) impractical as a general guide to biodiversity preserva
tion for that reason and because it is impossible, given the present state
of knowledge, to account for species interdependence; and critically, 3) mi
sguided because, at least over the relatively small species sets for which
data exist, there are generally no established or theoretically convincing
relationships between generic dissimilarity and species value.