We have evaluated the effect of the anisotropy of individual seeds on dose
distributions for permanent prostate implants using I-125 and Pd-103. The d
ose distributions were calculated for various implants using both the line
source and point source calculational formalisms, for two different models
of I-125 and Pd-103 seeds. The dose distributions were compared using cumul
ative dose volume histograms (DVH) and cumulative difference dose volume hi
stograms (Delta DVH) for the prostate target volume and for the rectum surf
ace. The DVHs could not distinguish between the dose distributions from iso
tropic and non-isotropic seeds. However, the Delta DVHs were useful in dete
rmining the fraction of the target volume for which the difference between
the dose distribution for line sources and for point sources exceeded a thr
eshold value. The dose distributions were calculated (1) for all the seeds
oriented co-linearly, along either the x-, y-, or z-axis, and (2) for the s
eeds at randomized orientations, more closely resembling the clinical situa
tion. For all cases, there was a significant difference in the effect of se
ed anisotropy from the different seed types. For the geometrically simpler
test cases with a small number of seeds, the effect of anisotropy on the do
se distribution was too large to ignore for any of the seed types investiga
ted. For the idealized pre-plan case, the effect was much smaller. For clin
ical prostate implants, the calculations done with seeds oriented co-linear
ly along the z-axis (needle implant axis) were a reasonable approximation f
or those from simulations of seeds with randomized orientations. Again, the
effect of anisotropy varied drastically between different seed models, and
also between different clinical cases. How ever, the effect of anisotropy
must be considered in the context of all the other uncertainties in clinica
l brachytherapy treatments. (C) 2001 American Association of Physicists in
Medicine. [DOI: 10.1118/1.1350674].