Naming, defining, and classifying in mental retardation

Recent discussions about changing the term mental retardation to a differen t term may be considered in the broader framework of three distinct but rel ated processes: naming (terminology), defining, and classifying. The three processes are analyzed according to their purposes and functions: In naming , a term is assigned; in defining, the term is explained; and in classifyin g, the group is divided into subgroups according to stated principles. The current status of each process is described, especially as represented in t he 1992 AAMR manual, Mental Retardation: Definition, Classification, and Sy stems of Supports. We suggest three sets of guiding questions that may help evaluate proposed changes in naming, defining, or classifying.