T. Banyasz et al., Different effects of endothelin-1 on calcium and potassium currents in canine ventricular cells, N-S ARCH PH, 363(4), 2001, pp. 383-390
Effects of endothelin-l (ET-1) on the L-type calcium current (I-Ca) and del
ayed rectifier potassium current (I-K) were studied in isolated canine vent
ricular cardiomyocytes using the whole-cell configuration of the patch-clam
p technique. ET-1 (8 nM) was applied in three experimental arrangements: un
treated cells, in the presence of 50 nM isoproterenol, and in the presence
of 250 muM 8-bromo-cAMP. In untreated cells, ET-1 significantly decreased t
he peak amplitude of I-Ca by 32.3 +/-4.8% at +5 mV (P<0.05) without changin
g activation or inactivation characteristics of I-Ca. ET-1 had no effect on
the amplitude of I-K, I-to (transient outward current) or I-K1 (inward rec
tifier K current) in untreated cells; however, the time course of recovery
from inactivation of I-to was significantly increased by ET-1 (from 26.5<pl
us/minus>6 ms to 59.5 +/- 1.8 ms, P<0.05). Amplitude and time course of int
racellular calcium transients, recorded in voltage-clamped cells previously
loaded with the fluorescent calcium indicator dye Fura-2, were not affecte
d by ET-1. ET-1 had no effect on force of contraction in canine ventricular
trabeculae.
Isoproterenol increased the amplitude of I-Ca to 263<plus/minus> 29% of con
trol. ET-1 reduced I-Ca also in isoproterenol-treated cells by 17.8 +/-2% (
P<0.05); this inhibition was significantly less than obtained in untreated
cells. I-K was increased by isoproterenol to 213<plus/minus>18% of control.
This effect of isoproterenol on I-K was reduced by 31.8 +/-4.8% if the cel
ls were pretreated with ET-1. Similarly, in isoproterenol-treated cells ET-
1 decreased I-K by 16.2 +/-1.5% (P<0.05). Maximal activation of protein kin
ase A (PKA) was achieved by application of 8-bromo-cAMP in the pipette solu
tion. In the presence of 8-bromo-cAMP ET-l failed to alter I-CA or I-K It w
as concluded that differences in effects of ET-1 on I-CA and I-K may be rel
ated to differences in cAMP sensitivity of the currents.