R. Schmidt et al., Prevention of haemodialysis-induced hypotension by biofeedback control of ultrafiltration and infusion, NEPH DIAL T, 16(3), 2001, pp. 595-603
Background. Haemodialysis-induced hypotension is still a severe complicatio
n in spite of all the progress in haemodialysis treatment. Because of its m
ultifactorial causes, haemodialysis-induced hypotension cannot be reliably
prevented by conventional ultrafiltration and sodium profiling in open-loop
systems, as they are unable to adapt themselves to actual decreases in blo
od pressure.
Methods. A blood-pressure-guided closed-loop system, for prevention of haem
odialysis-induced hypotension by biofeedback-driven computer control of bot
h ultrafiltration and saline infusion was clinically tested in 237 treatmen
ts of seven patients prone to hypotension. As medical knowledge on multifac
torial causes of hypotension is characterized by a lack in deterministic kn
owledge; fuzzy logic and linguistic variables were used to involve clinical
experience on hypotension phenomena in terms of fuzzy knowledge. Biofeedba
ck control is based on frequent measurements of blood pressure at 5 min int
ervals. Blood pressure behaviour is described by linguistic variables and f
uzzy sets. Adaptive rule bases were used for the simultaneous fuzzy control
of both the ultrafiltration and infusion of hypertonic saline (20% NaCl).
Proper adaptation of control features to patient's conditions was provided
by the critical borderline pressure, which was set by the physician individ
ually at the beginning of each treatment. During the initial and medium pha
ses of the sessions, ultrafiltration rates up to 150% of the average rates
were applied as long as decreases in blood pressure could be compensated by
saline infusion. The surplus of ultrafiltrate volume was used for blood pr
essure stabilization in the final phase in most instances by low ultrafiltr
ation rates.
Results. The advantages of biofeedback-controlled haemodialysis were demons
trated by both decreasing the frequency of hypotonic episodes and by increa
sing or maintaining constant levels of systolic blood pressure during the f
inal phase in 88% of treatments. As saline infusion was applied mainly in t
he initial and medium phases, blood sodium levels were not significantly hi
gher at the end of the sessions, and interdialytic weight gain was not elev
ated.
Conclusion. The application of fuzzy logic in the blood-pressure-guided bio
feedback control of ultrafiltration and sodium infusion during haemodialysi
s is able to minimize haemodialysis-induced hypotension.