Experimental designs for event-related functional magnetic resonance imagin
g can be characterized by both their detection power, a measure of the abil
ity to detect an activation, and their estimation efficiency, a measure of
the ability to estimate the shape of the hemodynamic response. Randomized d
esigns offer maximum estimation efficiency but poor detection power, while
block designs offer good detection power at the cost of minimum estimation
efficiency. Periodic single-trial designs are poor by both criteria. We pre
sent here a theoretical model of the relation between estimation efficiency
and detection power and show that the observed trade-off between efficienc
y and power is fundamental. Using the model, we explore the properties of s
emirandom designs that offer intermediate trade-offs between efficiency and
power. These designs can simultaneously achieve the estimation efficiency
of randomized designs and the detection power of block designs at the cost
of increasing the length of an experiment by less than a factor of 2. Exper
imental designs can also be characterized by their predictability, a measur
e of the ability to circumvent confounds such as habituation and anticipati
on. We examine the relation between detection power, estimation efficiency,
and predictability and show that small increases in predictability can off
er significant gains in detection power with only a minor decrease in estim
ation efficiency. (C) 2001 Academic Press.