Models of visual search performance typically assume that search proceeds b
y sampling without replacement. This requires memory for each deployment of
attention. We tested this assumption of memory-driven search using a multi
ple-target search paradigm. We held total set size constant, varied the num
ber of targets in the display, and asked subjects to report whether or not
there were at least n targets present, where n was varied by block. This al
lowed us to measure the time to find each subsequent target. Memory-driven
search predicts that reaction time should be a linear function of n. The al
ternative memory-free search hypothesis predicts an accelerating function.
The data falsify the memory-driven hypothesis. They were consistent with th
e memory-free search hypothesis but would also be consistent with memory fo
r a small number of previously attended locations.