Epidemiology, resistance, and outcomes of Acinetobacter baumannii bacteremia treated with imipenem-cilastatin or ampicillin-sulbactam

Citation
Tk. Jellison et al., Epidemiology, resistance, and outcomes of Acinetobacter baumannii bacteremia treated with imipenem-cilastatin or ampicillin-sulbactam, PHARMACOTHE, 21(2), 2001, pp. 142-148
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology
Journal title
PHARMACOTHERAPY
ISSN journal
02770008 → ACNP
Volume
21
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
142 - 148
Database
ISI
SICI code
0277-0008(200102)21:2<142:ERAOOA>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
Study Objective. To evaluate epidemiology, resistance, and treatment outcom es of Acinetobacter baumannii bacteremia treated with imipenem-cilastatin o r ampicillin-sulbactam for 72 hours or longer. Design. Retrospective analysis. Setting. University teaching hospital. Patients. Forty-eight patients with A. baumannii bacteremia. Intervention. Evaluation of susceptibility and clinical data from 48 patien ts treated with either ampicillin-sulbactam or imipenem-cilastatin from 198 7-1999. Measurements and Main Results. Comparing ampicillin-sulbactam and imipenem- cilastatin, there were no differences between days of bacteremia (4 vs 2 da ys, p = 0.05), days to resolution of temperature or white blood cell count, success or failure during or at end of treatment, or intensive care unit t otal or antibiotic-related length of stay (13 vs 10 days, p = 0.05). Patien ts treated with ampicillin-sulbactam had significantly decreased antibiotic treatment costs ($1500 vs $500, p = 0.004). Conclusion. Ampicillin-sulbactam is at least as effective as imipenem-cilas tatin based on clinical response at days 2, 7, and end of treatment and is a cost-effective alternative for treatment of A. baumannii infections.