Tk. Jellison et al., Epidemiology, resistance, and outcomes of Acinetobacter baumannii bacteremia treated with imipenem-cilastatin or ampicillin-sulbactam, PHARMACOTHE, 21(2), 2001, pp. 142-148
Study Objective. To evaluate epidemiology, resistance, and treatment outcom
es of Acinetobacter baumannii bacteremia treated with imipenem-cilastatin o
r ampicillin-sulbactam for 72 hours or longer.
Design. Retrospective analysis.
Setting. University teaching hospital.
Patients. Forty-eight patients with A. baumannii bacteremia.
Intervention. Evaluation of susceptibility and clinical data from 48 patien
ts treated with either ampicillin-sulbactam or imipenem-cilastatin from 198
7-1999.
Measurements and Main Results. Comparing ampicillin-sulbactam and imipenem-
cilastatin, there were no differences between days of bacteremia (4 vs 2 da
ys, p = 0.05), days to resolution of temperature or white blood cell count,
success or failure during or at end of treatment, or intensive care unit t
otal or antibiotic-related length of stay (13 vs 10 days, p = 0.05). Patien
ts treated with ampicillin-sulbactam had significantly decreased antibiotic
treatment costs ($1500 vs $500, p = 0.004).
Conclusion. Ampicillin-sulbactam is at least as effective as imipenem-cilas
tatin based on clinical response at days 2, 7, and end of treatment and is
a cost-effective alternative for treatment of A. baumannii infections.