R. Samuel et al., Phylogenetic analyses of Aurantioideae (Rutaceae) based on non-coding plastid DNA sequences and phytochemical features, PLANT BIO, 3(1), 2001, pp. 77-87
Sequences of the plastid DNA atpB/rbcL intergenic spacer and rps16 intron f
rom 23 genera and 47 species of Rutaceae were used to resolve phylogenetic
relationships in subfamily Aurantioideae. According to these, the subfamily
is monophyletic, but its classical subdivision into tribes Clauseneae and
Citreae is only justified if the genus Murraya s.s. (exclusive of the speci
es segregated as Bergera, e.g., Murraya koenigii and M. siamensis) and Merr
illia are transferred to Citreae s.l. This conclusion is also well supporte
d by phytochemistry, demonstrating accumulation of carbazoles in Bergera an
d Clausena, and of 8-prenylated coumarins and polyoxygenated flavonoids in
Murraya s.s. and Merrillia. Formation of both carbazoles, as well as 8-pren
ylated coumarins, and polyoxygenated flavonoids in Micromelum suggests rela
tionships between Clauseneae s.s. and Citreae s.l. The monophyly of several
larger genera in both tribes is supported by relatively high bootstrap per
centages and specific chemical profiles for e.g., Clausena, Micromelum, Gly
cosmis and Atalantia. In contrast, molecular, chemical, and other data show
that none of the subtribes recognized within Aurantioideae reflect phyloge
netic relationships. Only the clades with Clausena + Bergera, Murraya s.s.
+ Merrillia, and Citrus + Clymenia + Eremocitrus + Fortunella + Poncirus ("
true Citrus fruit trees") are well supported by such data. Among the outgro
up genera, Zanthoxylum (Rutoideae) and Toddalia (Toddalioideae) are much cl
oser to each other than to Ruta (Rutoideae).